NAHP hand drum logo copyrighted

Girl & Parrot copyrightedNative American

Heritage Programs

Native American Heritage Programs shares Lenape (Delaware Indian) culture & contributions of Native Americans.

frog on world   International Year of the Frog!                                    Sign Up

 
Kitschinipen - Summer          Winaminge - Time of the Roasting Ears of Corn          Updated!

Why Teach About Native America?

Sept. 3, 2007 -- A new report from Public Agenda documents significant gaps in non-Indian knowledge about Native peoples. 

Compiled by Jennifer Holladay        From Teaching Tolerance Magazine

Walking a Mile

In what is likely the most in-depth exploration of contemporary attitudes about Native America, a new qualitative study from Public Agenda finds large gaps in knowledge and viewpoint between Native Americans and non-Native Americans, as well as an area of common interest: Both groups support more education about historical and contemporary issues affecting America's first peoples.

New Public Opinion Research of Indians, non-Indians Reveals Wide Gaps, Mutual Desire to Increase Understanding Through Education.

Walking a Mile: A First Step Toward Mutual Understanding 

August 29, 2007    Michael Hamill Remaley or Claudia Feurey at 212-686-6610 

Most Americans admit knowing little of contemporary Indian life; Indians eager to show successes and continuing challenges.

The nonpartisan public opinion research and citizen engagement organization Public Agenda today released a new qualitative study exploring how American Indians* and non-Indians think about each other titled “Walking a Mile: A First Step Toward Mutual Understanding.” The research explores Indian’s perceptions of their place in contemporary American society and how non-Indians view American Indians, what they know (or think they know), the generalizations they make and stereotypes they hold, how their perceptions were formed and their interest in learning more.

If the link does not work copy & paste it in your Browser window.               The research is available online at:  http://www.publicagenda.org/WalkingaMile

Given the limited documented opinion research on the topic, this study may be one of the most in-depth examinations of the thinking of these two groups about each other yet undertaken. The findings are based on the views of people in 12 focus groups conducted in 2006 and 2007 throughout the United States: seven with Indians and five with non-Indians.

“This study sheds important light on the challenges created by misperceptions of contemporary Native America. It certainly accords with what we see and hear on the ground,” said Joseph P. Kalt, Co-Director of the Harvard Project on American Indian Economic Development at the John F. Kennedy School of Government.

“Public Agenda's report is a critical step in furthering Indian White relations,” said Ruth Yellowhawk of the Indigenous Issues Forums. “Until we examine those places where we are struggling, and key knowledge gaps that exist we cannot understand ways to move forward with dignity and grace. Let's hope that this small step of revealing ways people are thinking allows for the kind of self-reflection that can engender positive action for such disparate nations.”

The research details the thinking of both groups regarding Indian history, the present and how better understanding can develop in the future. The research shows how little most Americans know about the diversity of contemporary Indian experience and points to the need for depictions of Indians outside of casinos and impoverished reservations.

While the Indians interviewed for the research described their sadness about the past and widespread prejudice and discrimination against Indians today, they also talked about their hopes and feelings of success – their pride in the great strides Indians have made economically and theirs sense that their lives are improving.

The research also points to a number of revelations that call for additional research. For instance, why non-Indians acknowledge that Indians have been badly mistreated in the past, on the one hand, and yet at the same time resent what they see as “preferential treatment” by the government, on the other. The report also notes generally more favorable attitudes toward Indians among Americans living far from concentrations of Indian populations and a somewhat higher prevalence of more negative views among those living closer to Indian reservations.

The study includes detailed analysis of the research, extensive quotes from participants and a matrix that succinctly summarizes Indians’ and non-Indians’ attitudes on basic issues, views of daily Indian life, Indian culture and identity and how to move forward. The research was made possible by a grant from The Christian A. Johnson Endeavor Foundation.

* While some Indians interviewed for this project prefer to use the term “Native American,” the Bureau of Indian Affairs reports that the tribes it represents generally prefer the term “American Indian.” Consequently, the latter is used exclusively in the report.

Public Agenda is a nonprofit organization dedicated to nonpartisan public policy research. Founded in 1975 by former U.S. Secretary of State Cyrus Vance and Daniel Yankelovich, the social scientist and author, Public Agenda is well respected for its influential public opinion surveys and balanced citizen education materials. Its mission is to inject the public's voice into crucial policy debates. Public Agenda seeks to inform leaders about the public's views and to engage citizens in discussing complex policy issues.

Classroom Activity

Before introducing the report to the class, ask students to write down five words they believe best describe Native Americans.

Allow students time to read the report, or prepared excerpts, and then discuss:

What are key areas where Indian and non-Indian views differ?

Some non-Indians say Hollywood movies have largely informed their perceptions of Native Americans. What films have you seen that depict Native Americans? How are Indians portrayed? Are the films set in the past or the present? Why is this relevant to the report's findings?

Many Native Americans tie current issues afflicting indigenous communities to past atrocities, while non-Native Americans tend to believe such problems can be overcome if Indians only "tried harder." Which of these views appeals most to you, or do both appeal equally? Why?

The report says Native Americans who do not live on reservations are largely "invisible" to non-Native people. Why might this be?

Native Americans say they feel caught between two worlds. What does this mean? Describe a time when you felt this way.

As a closing activity, ask students to write an essay explaining how the five words that they jotted down at the beginning of the activity relate to the report's findings and identifying at least one topic about which they'd like to learn more. Create opportunities for students to do so.

Professional Development Reflection

Make a list of the resources you use in the classroom that depict Native Americans, or pull out hard copies for hands-on review.

Do the resources include or evoke stereotypical depictions of Indians, i.e., The Noble Savage, The Demonic Indian, or others?  (Web Editors Note: See our other pages).

List the resources by historical era, from conquest to the 21st century. Where is your list "short"? Identify three ways to expand it.

If you use a mandated textbook, examine its inclusion of Native America – looking at both its depictions of Indians and the time and place treatment. How should this affect your selection of supplemental material?

How do the materials explain treaty rights? What might you add to your curriculum to bring these between-nations documents alive in a contemporary context?

If the link does not work copy & paste it in your Browser window.

From: Teaching For Tolerance http://www.tolerance.org/teach/current/event.jsp?cid=862

Visit their link for information on Project Cradleboard and other interesting articles.